Cases 51 - 60 of 69
TALLEY et al v. SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv06541
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY, MINORITIES OF PENNSYLVANIA and PA AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, CENTRE COUNTY'S COURTHOUSE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF CENTRE COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. PA Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv02074
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
PA Dept. of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, Tammy Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEY v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2016cv01318
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant:
ROBERT D. GILMORE , ZAKEN , W. LEGGETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. McCoy et al
as 3:2016cv01726
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Matthew McCoy, John E. Wetzel, Tabb Bickell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEY v. KING et al
as 2:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant:
R. C/O KING and ORBASH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Talley v. Eidsvoog et al
as 3:2016cv00207
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Carol Eidsvoog, Xue, Unknown Private Contractor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2016cv00088
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
J. E. Wetzel, The Program Review Committee at SCI-Greene, The Psychiatric Review Team at SCI-Greene and others
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEY v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2015cv01646
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant:
SGT. DAVIS, LT. SILEAUGH, C/O R. KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2015cv02217
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Tammy Ferguson, Robert Muir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEY v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2015cv01502
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, FLEMMING, LEACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
