Cases 51 - 60 of 1,029
SMITH-EL BEY v. FLINT et al
as 1:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. SMITH-EL BEY
Defendant:
BILL FLINT, MS. M. SHEFFIELD, RONNIE FILEDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. USA
as 1:2023cv00155
Petitioner:
ISAISAH DASHON SMITH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SMITH-EL BEY v. FLINT et al
as 1:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. SMITH-EL BEY
Defendant:
BILL FLINT, RONNIE FIELDS, MS. BONNIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin Bey v. Parks et al
as 5:2023ct03034
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Defendant:
Lt. Parks, Sgt. Smith, Sgt. Yearger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chiles v. Smith et al
as 5:2023ct03029
Plaintiff:
William Brandon Chiles
Defendant:
Domanick D. Smith, Sergeant Heigler, Officer Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherenfant v. FCC Butner Wardens et al
as 5:2023ct03023
Plaintiff:
Nertant Cherenfant
Defendant:
FCC Butner Wardens, FCI 2 Butner, Warden Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SMITH-EL BEY v. RODRIGUEZ
as 1:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. SMITH-EL BEY
Defendant:
CORPORAL RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. United States of America
as 5:2023hc02006
Petitioner:
James Leonard Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wallace v. McVicker et al
as 5:2023ct03005
Plaintiff:
Marcel Romains Wallace
Defendant:
James McVicker, David Shaw, Antwone Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. FCC Butner et al
as 5:2022ct03457
Plaintiff:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Defendant:
FCC Butner, Lynn B. Kelly, Officer Sosa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
