Cases 51 - 60 of 397
Antrell Brown v. MI, et al
as 22-1136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTRELL VONICQUE BROWN, aka Islamic Ali
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DANA NESSEL and others
Bryant #463608 et al v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Reo Bryant #463608, Donald Hicks #514050, Leonard Gregory Walker #651851 and others
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, The People of the State of Michigan, The People of the United States of America and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Tyrone Boswell #503804
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bixler, Jr. v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv10205
Plaintiff:
Stephen Robert Bixler, Jr.
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections and State of Michigan
Sean Ryan v. MI, et al
as 22-1048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN MICHAEL RYAN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORIZON HEALTHCARE, INC. and others
Antrell Brown v. MI, et al
as 22-1004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTRELL VONICQUE BROWN, Islamic Ali
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES) #1, named as Corizon Personnel and others
Jackson v. Miniard
as 2:2021cv12840
Petitioner:
Giovontae O. Jackson
Respondent:
People Of State of Michigan and Gary Miniard
Holbrook v. State of Michigan
as 2:2021cv12759
Petitioner:
Charles Holbrook
Respondent:
State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holbrook v. State of Michigan
as 4:2021cv08971
Petitioner:
Charles Holbrook
Respondent:
State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOLBROOK v. STATE OF MICHIGAN
as 1:2021cv03104
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HOLBROOK
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rouse et al v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 5:2021cv12670
Plaintiff:
Arthur J. Rouse, John Moore, David Sarfo and others
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, State of Michigan, MDOC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
