Cases 51 - 60 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1153
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04573
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DAY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2017cv01418
Plaintiff:
ROGER CHARLES DAY, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Larry Wimberly v. USA, et al
as 17-16281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY WIMBERLY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Wimberly v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv00858
Plaintiff:
Larry Wimberly
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of State, United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1874
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Szabo v. United States Department of St
as 17-899
Plaintiff:
Fasika Bezabeh
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jessica Szabo
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, John Does, 1-2 and Jane Does, 1-2
Defendant:
United States Department of State, State of New York, Charles T. Rawley and others
Lily Cassandra Alphonsis v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2016cv07927
Plaintiff:
Lily Cassandra Alphonsis
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of States and United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0555
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
