Cases 51 - 60 of 129
Chisolm v. State of South Carolina
as 4:2017cv02934
Petitioner:
DonSurvi Chisolm
Respondent:
Warden Perry Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frank Tolen, Jr. v. Larry Cartledge
as 17-7399
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANK TOLEN, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY CARTLEDGE, Warden, Perry Correctional Institution
Robinson v. Warden Perry Correctional Institution
as 5:2017cv02150
Petitioner:
Corey Jawan Robinson
Respondent:
Warden Perry Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Terrance Griffin v. Warden Perry Correctional
as 17-7024
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRANCE GRIFFIN
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Willie Poole v. Warden, Perry Corr Inst.
as 17-7000
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIE JAMES POOLE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Kevin Dickens v. Deputy Warden Klein, et al
as 17-2018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN L. DICKENS
Defendant - Appellee:
COMM. CARL C. DANBERG, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER THOMAS CARROLL, BUREAU CHIEF RICK KEARNEY and others
John Taylor v. Laurie Spraga, et al
as 17-1776
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN A. TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
LAURIE ANN SPRAGA, D.O., NURSE PRACTICIONER EDWARD HENDRICKS, in his individual capacity, CONTRACTOR CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC, in its official and individual capacity and others
Spears v. Warden Perry Correctional Institution
as 6:2017cv00777
Petitioner:
Phillip Lee Spears
Respondent:
Warden Perry Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tyler v. Warden Perry Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00285
Petitioner:
Randall S Tyler
Respondent:
Warden Perry Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Griffin v. Warden Perry Correctional Institution
as 0:2016cv03691
Petitioner:
Terrance Griffin
Respondent:
Warden Perry Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.