Cases 51 - 60 of 104
Smith #120870 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01278
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lavance Smith
Defendant:
Unknown Musachio and Unknown Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2015cv01094
Petitioner:
Jimmy D Woods
Respondent:
Mark Brnovich and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alexander #105500 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01109
Plaintiff:
Charles LaVerne Alexander, II
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Terry Stewart, Samual Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dutcher #067784 v. Ryan
as 2:2015cv01079
Plaintiff:
Robert William Dutcher
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Terry Stewart, Samuel Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray #065477 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv00971
Plaintiff:
Ronald Leslie Murray
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Terry Stewart, Samuel Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood #164952 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv02664
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, S Childs and Unknown Vicklund
Plaintiff:
Brandon Mykel Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De La Cruz v. Unknown Party et al
as 4:2014cv02462
Plaintiff:
Armando Garcia De La Cruz
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Kyle Garcia, Eduardo M Ferriol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oropeza v. Canteen/Trinity Correctional Food Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv02113
Plaintiff:
Frederico Oropeza
Defendant:
Canteen/Trinity Correctional Food Services Incorporated, Arizona, State of, G Bonorand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oropeza v. Canteen/Trinity Correctional Food Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv01991
Plaintiff:
Frederico Oropeza
Defendant:
Canteen/Trinity Correctional Food Services Incorporated, Arizona, State of, G Bonorand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Ryan
as 4:2014cv02236
Petitioner:
Joseph Rudolph Wood, III
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
