Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in South Carolina
Cases 51 - 60 of 24,947
Santos v. Garrett
as 6:2024cv03047
Plaintiff: Eliseo Santos and Eliseo Santos,
Defendant: Brice Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dhimo v. State of South Carolina
as 4:2024cv03039
Petitioner: Alqi Dhimo
Respondent: State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Little v. McDaniel
as 0:2024cv03044
Plaintiff: David Antonio Little, Jr
Defendant: Eric McDaniel and Florence County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
King v. Lieber Correctional Institution
as 0:2024cv03037
Plaintiff: Eugene King
Defendant: Lieber Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Haynesworth v. Garvin et al
as 2:2024cv03042
Plaintiff: Alphonso Haynesworth
Defendant: Leona Garvin, Ms. Dube, Lisa Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. USA
as 3:2024cv03054
Petitioner: Thurl Rakim Anderson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Dwyer v. Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
as 5:2024cv03036
Petitioner: Matthew C Dwyer
Respondent: SCDC and Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grant v. Deputy Angel Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv03021
Plaintiff: Herman Grant, Jr.
Defendant: Deputy Angel Rodriguez, Deputy Richard Sholtz and John Doe Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Orr v. Richland County
as 4:2024cv03019
Plaintiff: Jeremy Clay Orr
Defendant: Richland County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Young v. USA
as 3:2024cv03013
Petitioner: Kenneth Levi Young
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?