Cases 61 - 70 of 184
Benner v. Indiana Attorney General
as 3:2020cv00731
Petitioner:
Mark Benner
Respondent:
Indiana Attorney General and Probation Officer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Saillant v. Horthan et al
as 4:2020cv01109
Respondent:
USA, Mr. Benner, William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Jhensy Saillant
Defendant:
Jonathan Horthan, Captain O'Brian, Dr. Buck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARRIS v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2020cv03745
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., STEVE MILLER, DR. WILSON and others
Plaintiff:
LOGAN TYRELL HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHURAWLOW v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2020cv03493
Defendant:
AMANDA BENNER, KYLE RUSSELL and DR. DEBORAH WILSON
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN E. SCHURAWLOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Span v. Kordick et al
as 1:2020cv03563
Defendant:
Amanda Trantina, Shabbir Zacif, Megan M Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Span
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. Renzi et al
as 1:2020cv01159
Defendant:
. Nall, . Lee, . Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JEFFERSON v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv00941
Petitioner:
RONALD JEFFERSON
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF, WARDEN SCI BENNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BUTLER v. DJINDJIEV et al
as 5:2019cv06131
Defendant:
STEEL STONE ROAD HANOVER TOWNSHIP WHO WORKED OCTOBER 13TH - 14TH (3RD SHIFT), JOSH LEADBETTER, DILLON KOCH and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK SEAN BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REQUENA v. PRIMECARE MEDICAL et al
as 5:2019cv05509
Plaintiff:
JOEL REQUENA
Defendant:
PRIMECARE MEDICAL and AMANDA BENNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GONDOR v. BENNETT et al
as 2:2019cv05428
Defendant:
RYAN BENNER, MICHAEL MURPHY, UNKNOWN SUPERVISER OF ROBERT BENNET - UDPD and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. GONDOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
