Cases 61 - 70 of 447
Mason v. Day et al
as 3:2022cv01008
Plaintiff:
French Mason and French Chester Mason Bey
Defendant:
Day, Butler, Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENZEL v. VANTLIN et al
as 2:2022cv00477
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL T. HENZEL
Defendant:
DOUG VANTLIN, NOBLE PARISH, KOLHOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILLS v. MILLER et al
as 2:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
SCOTTY ROY HILLS
Defendant:
MILLER, BISHOP, MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS et al v. EDMONDS et al
as 1:2022cv02184
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
REAGAL, EDMONDS, A. SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mann v. Miller et al
as 3:2022cv00839
Plaintiff:
Lucas Robert-Jay Mann
Defendant:
Miller, Davis and Rojo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. St Joseph County Jail et al
as 3:2022cv00926
Plaintiff:
Ralph Richardson
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail, Leach, Olmstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LONGEST v. MILLER et al
as 2:2022cv00494
Plaintiff:
CODY DUANE LONGEST
Defendant:
MILLER, KANEIPP, KITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BYCKETT v. JONES et al
as 2:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS BYCKETT
Defendant:
ROBERT JONES, MILLER and PREA COORDINATOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREGORY v. CARSON et al
as 2:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. GREGORY
Defendant:
RICHARD CARSON, OLL J. RANEY, TAWNI TEMPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARNEY v. SCHULTZ et al
as 2:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
MELVIN WES HARNEY
Defendant:
ZACHARY SCHULTZ, CHARLES F. MILLER, MIA E. KELSAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
