Cases 61 - 70 of 241
Lujan Trevino v. Gutierrez et al
as 5:2020cv00180
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Clerk of Immigration Court, Social Security Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Reyes Lujan Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fawley v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 2:2020cv01236
Respondent:
Dwayne Satatisteran, Jane/John Doe, Alisha Tafoya-Lucero, Secretary of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Benjamin W. Fawley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Stanley v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2020cv06111
Defendant:
Lujan, Acting Warden Ronald Broomfield, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Frank Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Stanley v. Broomfield et al
as 2:2020cv01509
Defendant:
Lujan, Ronald Broomfield, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Frank Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. Tafoya-Lucero et al
as 1:2020cv00612
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya-Lucero, Geo Group Inc., Centurion Correctional Healthcare of New Mexico and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Vencent Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hill v. McGeffen et al
as 2:2020cv01422
Defendant:
Lujan, Blanco, McGeffen and others
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Howell v. Baker et al
as 2:2020cv01210
Defendant:
Z. Lujan, W. Sampley, J. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 1:2020cv00387
Defendant:
Metropolitan Detention Center and Michelle Lujan-Grisham
Plaintiff:
Daniel R Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 1:2020cv00386
Defendant:
Metropolitan Detention Center and Michelle Lujan-Grisham
Plaintiff:
Douglas Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldman v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 1:2020cv00388
Plaintiff:
Stephen Goldman
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan-Grisham and Metropolitan Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
