Cases 61 - 70 of 518
Stanley v. Grey et al
as 4:2022cv04036
Plaintiff:
Eric Romar Stanley
Defendant:
Corporal Grey, Officer Smith, Officer Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Marbley et al
as 4:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Xavier Cortez Hudson
Defendant:
Tina Marbley, CoreCivic West Tennessee Detention and Marrel Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Adams et al
as 4:2022cv04035
Plaintiff:
Eric Demond Russell
Defendant:
Captain Adams, Sergeant Golden, Correctional Officer Mrs. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonds v. Adams et al
as 4:2022cv04034
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Reid Bonds
Defendant:
Captain Golden Adams, Steven King, Nurse Chelsea Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00282
Plaintiff:
Kevin Smith
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Joe Paige, III, Thomas Hearst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurdsman v. USA
as 4:2022cv00312
Petitioner:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Frazier v. Doe
as 4:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Frazier
Defendant:
Doe, Does 1-4, Doctor, Linda, Cook, Cheryl, Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Woods et al
as 4:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Terry L McCoy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Stanley James, Gary McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beard v. Adams et al
as 4:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Francisco Beard
Defendant:
Adams, Baker, Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. Michel et al
as 4:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Wesley Adam Reaves
Defendant:
Ben Michel, David Menotti and Shiloh Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
