Cases 61 - 70 of 2,632
Melvin Simmons v. Kathleen Allison et al
as 2:2022cv07376
Petitioner:
Melvin Simmons, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison and Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Simmons v. Allison et al
as 1:2022cv01243
Petitioner:
Melvin Simmons, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison and Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Welsh v. Cates
as 3:2022cv01497
Petitioner:
Richard David Welsh, Jr.
Respondent:
C. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CATES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv00827
Petitioner:
MAURICE VINSHAWN CATES, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Melvin Joseph Simmons v. Kathleen Allison et al
as 2:2022cv06946
Petitioner:
Melvin Joseph Simmons, Jr. and Laura Mae Roushion Simmons
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison, Brian Cates, Bailor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clyde Ozell Pittman Jr. v. Brian Cates
as 2:2022cv06937
Petitioner:
Clyde Ozell Pittman, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Mayberry v. Cates
as 1:2022cv01177
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles Mayberry
Defendant:
Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Hetzel v. Brian Cates
as 22-55817
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH HETZEL
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN CATES, Warden
(PC) Sanford v. Newsom et al
as 1:2022cv01100
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Sanford
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Brian Cates and C Schuyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Simmons v. Allison et al
as 1:2022cv01031
Petitioner:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison, Brian Cates, Bailor and others
Not Classified By Court:
Laura Mae Roushion Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
