Cases 61 - 70 of 494
Mourning v. IRS-Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2023cv00970
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee Mourning
Defendant:
IRS-Internal Revenue Service, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Franklin et al
as 3:2023cv01119
Plaintiff:
Donald Perry
Defendant:
Melissa Franklin, Internal Revenue Service, Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maestas v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Maestas
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy et al v. IRS
as 4:2023cv01750
Plaintiff:
Hickory McCoy and Marinda Heflin
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00068
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Quincetta Cargill v. USA, et al
as 23-35185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINCETTA Y. CARGILL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOSEPH R BIDEN, President of the United States of America, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States of America and others
(PC) McCoy et al v. IRS
as 2:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
Hickory McCoy and Marinda Heflin
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00068
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
