Cases 61 - 70 of 298
ROBICHAW v. MCGEE et al
as 2:2021cv05282
Plaintiff:
RENALDO M. ROBICHAW
Defendant:
SEAN P. MCGEE, JOSEPH M. LYNCH, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RISTER v. MEYER et al
as 2:2021cv05058
Plaintiff:
TARRELL R. RISTER
Defendant:
GREGORY MEYER, MICHAEL T. LAVERGHETTA, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERCHA v. SPICER et al
as 2:2021cv05011
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PERCHA
Defendant:
MICHAEL E. SPICER, OFFICER JOHN DOE 1, OFFICER JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv04669
Plaintiff:
ALEX PETERSON
Defendant:
C/O/ KEISHA WATSON, C/O/ JOHN DOE ELBY and C/O/ JOHN DOE 2 KENNIZAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER v. SRGT. VINGALISS et al
as 2:2021cv04633
Plaintiff:
MUBARAK ALEXANDER
Defendant:
SRGT. VINGALISS, SRGT. HARTMAN, NURSE KRISTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCNEVIN v. WIANT et al
as 1:2021cv00270
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW T. MCNEVIN
Defendant:
WIANT, DIETRICH, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
EASLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, OBERLANDER, SARATELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MASSAQUOI v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS, MAUREEN MALANOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BOWMAN v. BRADLEY et al
as 2:2021cv02860
Respondent:
JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 1, MADELINE QUINN and others
Petitioner:
MELVIN BOWMAN
Defendant:
MARK WAHL, LORIE EASON and CRAIG MCEWEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARPENTER v. GEO SECURE SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02830
Defendant:
CORRECTION OFFICER, JOHN DOE 1, GEO SECURE SERVICES, LLC, CORRECTION OFFICER, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CARPENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
