Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Phillips v. Bennett
as 3:2023cv05133
Petitioner:
Dan A Phillips
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cox v. Bennett
as 3:2023cv05036
Petitioner:
Brian Gleen Cox
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez Carrillo v. Bennett
as 2:2022cv00296
Petitioner:
Jose Mario Lopez Carrillo
Respondent:
State of Washington and Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Senior v. Washington State Attorney General et al
as 2:2022cv01537
Petitioner:
Alfonso V Senior, Jr
Respondent:
Washington State Attorney General and Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lumpkins v. Bennett
as 3:2022cv05852
Petitioner:
William W Lumpkins
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Currie v. Haynes
as 3:2022cv05823
Petitioner:
Leon Denard Currie
Respondent:
Jason Bennett and Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Red v. Bennett
as 3:2022cv05750
Petitioner:
Kevin Anthony Red
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDaniel v. Bennett
as 3:2022cv05753
Petitioner:
Dennis McDaniel
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aurel v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Mitch Aurel and Mich Aurel
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Larry Hogan, Wayne Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandvigen v. Strange et al
as 4:2021cv05111
Plaintiff:
Michael Jasen Sandvigen
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Jeff Uttecht, Jason Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
