Cases 61 - 70 of 99
CARR v. CHRONIC CARE SOLUTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv04038
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-2, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, CHRONIC CARE SOLUTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WELDON CARROLL and ROBERT WELDON CARR, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Small v. Gelipeau et al
as 3:2019cv00751
Plaintiff:
Jason Douglas Small
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Gelipeau, John Doe 1 and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lampkins v. Miami Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2019cv00341
Plaintiff:
Lavon Lampkins
Defendant:
Miami Correctional Facility, John Doe #2 and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE 1 v. WEST et al
as 1:2019cv01563
Defendant:
NEAL FETZ, ANGELA WEST and GEO GROUP, INC
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bogan v. Alevizos et al
as 3:2019cv00301
Plaintiff:
James Demarco Bogan and James D Bogan
Defendant:
Thomas J Alevizos, John Does 1-50 and 60th Judicial Circuit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. GEO GROUP, INC.
as 1:2019cv01380
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOHN 1 DOE and JOHN DOE 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KORYEYON v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2019cv01050
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1 2 and 3, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE MARION COUNTY, INDIANA and KERRY J FORESTAL, SHERIFF OF MARION COUNTY, INDIANA
Plaintiff:
SAMSON KORYEYON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BOTKINS v. SAYLOR et al
as 1:2019cv00631
Defendant:
SHAW, DAVIS, SAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ARTHUR BOTKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORRIS et al v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2019cv00495
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY SHAWN NORRIS, JOHN DOE 1 and DEREK ANTHONY ANDERSON
Defendant:
JESSE EMERSON, ANDRE MIKSHA, PAUL KAUSHALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRUCE v. DOE et al
as 2:2018cv00526
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #2, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JOHN DOE #1
Plaintiff:
JASON KENNETH BRUCE
Interested Party:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
