Cases 61 - 70 of 1,161
Woodridge v. Cook County DOC et al
as 1:2023cv04455
Plaintiff:
Anthony Woodridge
Defendant:
Cook County DOC, G. Moore and Sean Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman et al v. Dawson et al
as 1:2023cv04250
Plaintiff:
Keshawn Freeman, Raynada Jones, Herbie McBride and others
Defendant:
James Dawson, Cherryle Hinthorne, Wexford Health Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinde v. Wooley et al
as 3:2023cv02197
Plaintiff:
Raymond Stinde
Defendant:
Sarah C Wooley, S Waiker, Joshua Schoenbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03965
Plaintiff:
Jhery Jones
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, David Brown, Yvette Wooten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Green et al
as 3:2023cv03209
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jones
Defendant:
Brittany Green, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv01993
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jones
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Kevin Johnson and Jeremiah Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. People of the State of Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv03204
Plaintiff:
Rivaughn Lee
Defendant:
People of the State of Illinois, Ruben Brandon, Shawn Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv03592
Plaintiff:
Sheila M Jones
Defendant:
Tom Dart and C,C,D,O.C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Daley et al
as 1:2023cv01210
Plaintiff:
Sam Jones
Defendant:
Michael Daley, Brad Solberg and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyson v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv03325
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Elizabeth W. Canelas, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
