Cases 61 - 70 of 548
Houston v. Phillips
as 4:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Bibb Houston
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips and Herbert Slatery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doss v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Harold Doss
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Clifton D. Craig
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pegues v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Pegues
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Marion County Sherriff's Department et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Bryan R. Phillips
Defendant:
Marion County Sherriff's Department, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Jermaine L. Hunter
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Board of Paroles and Amber Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Strada et al
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Tareynton Reshard Rogers
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Shawn Phillips and Joshua Kays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv01042
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant:
Donald Allen, FNU Boyd, Joshua Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Lee Malone
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
