Cases 61 - 70 of 1,673
Meyers v. Vancey et al
as 5:2023ct03346
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
D. Vancey, Jason Farmer, Ms. Whittaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Priest
as 5:2023hc02273
Petitioner:
William Stevenson Phillips
Respondent:
Pazavar Priest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL-EL v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF REGISTER et al
as 1:2023cv01086
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ROBERT HILL-EL
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF REGISTER and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Greene et al
as 5:2023ct03332
Plaintiff:
Joshua Johnson
Defendant:
Steadman Jody Greene, William Rogers, Bernetta Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Floyde et al
as 5:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Williams
Defendant:
Elizabeth Floyde, Joseph Crosswhite, Sam Winthrop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Carver
as 5:2023hc02257
Petitioner:
Charles A. Williams
Respondent:
Ben Carver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Cooper et al
as 5:2023ct03322
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
Governor Roy Cooper, Todd E. Ishee, Stephen Waddell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Biecker et al
as 5:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Chris Biecker, FNU Miller, R. Honeycutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, Amy Jenkins, Daniel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
