Cases 61 - 70 of 30,459
Jones v. Strickland et al
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Thaddeaus Jones
Respondent:
David Strickland and Baniecia Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murdock v. Ingram et al
as 3:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ajanaku Murdock
Defendant:
Kevin Ingram, FNU Williams and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDANIEL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00403
Petitioner:
MARCUS JERMAINE MCDANIEL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lebron v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02093
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Lebron
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MORRIS v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00395
Respondent:
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, N.C. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and MARY LOCKLEAR
Petitioner:
MATTHEW MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeLeon v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2024ct03107
Plaintiff:
Abel DeLeon
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Caldwell v. Carroll
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Cedric Caldwell
Defendant:
FNU Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCALLISTER v. OFFICIALS AT FORSYTH COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Defendant:
OFFICIALS AT FORSYTH COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00463
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Cobbs v. Harrell et al
as 5:2024ct03106
Plaintiff:
Rodney Elroy Cobbs
Defendant:
Richard K. Harrell and Ricardo Jensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
