Cases 71 - 80 of 5,696
Perkins v. Daniels et al
as 0:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Victor B. Perkins
Defendant:
Dr. Jack Daniels and Dr. Dionne Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. USA
as 0:2024cv01080
Petitioner:
Jyron Mendall Woodard
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Morales v. MN DOC et al
as 0:2024cv01091
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Morales
Defendant:
MN DOC, MCF - Faribault, Jodi Atinsted and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kujak v. Minnesota, The State of
as 0:2024cv01092
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Jerry Roman Kujak
Defendant:
Minnesota, The State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv01034
Petitioner:
Zantra Williams
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Miles v. Johnston et al
as 0:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
Gordon Miles
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Nancy Stacken, Courtney Menton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobo v. USA
as 0:2024cv00988
Petitioner:
Theodore Harold Edward Bobo, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Martin v. Brott et al
as 0:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
Julyen Alozno Martin
Defendant:
Joel Brott, Sherburne Jail Commander, Jail Captains and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry et al v. Walz et al
as 0:2024cv00962
Petitioner:
Cederic Lamont Berry and Cedric Lamont Berry
Respondent:
Tim Walz and Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horswell v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv00949
Petitioner:
Phillip Harold Horswell
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
