Cases 71 - 80 of 142
Whitt v. Brazier et al (INMATE 1)(LEAD CASE)
as 1:2021cv00705
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
James Brazier, Kelita Moore, Donald J. Valenza and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Officer Isler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Russell County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2021cv00704
Plaintiff:
Daryus S. Sullivan and Daryus D. Sullivan
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Sgt. Schroeder, Heath Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2021cv00707
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Donald J. Valenza, Spencer Downs, Kelita Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Russell County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2021cv00689
Plaintiff:
Daryus D. Sullivan
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Sgt. Schroeder, Lt. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Brazier et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2021cv00680
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
James Brazier and Lt. Twrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Moore et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00679
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Kelita Moore and Officer Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Brazier et al (INMATE 2)(MEMBER CASE)
as 1:2021cv00672
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
James Brazier and Spencer Downs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Wyatt et al (INMATE 1)(LEAD CASE)
as 1:2021cv00671
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
James Wyatt and James Brazier
Consolidated Defendant:
Spencer Downs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryles v. Taylor et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2021cv00589
Plaintiff:
Sanford Leonard Ryles
Defendant:
Heath Taylor, Mike Loyless, Steve Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 3:2021cv00552
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Petty
Defendant:
Heath Taylor, Wayne Johnson, Sergeant Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
