Cases 71 - 80 of 314
Allen v. Clark et al
as 4:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
Brian Allen
Defendant:
Clark, Hill, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Does
as 4:2022cv00350
Plaintiff:
Kendrick A Robinson, Sr
Defendant:
Does "Intake Officers", "Intake Nurse" Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility, G Clark and Kim Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fraizer v. Clark et al
as 4:2022cv00512
Plaintiff:
Nelson Fraizer
Defendant:
Clark, Hill, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morningstar v. King et al
as 4:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
Khanis-Orion Morningstar
Defendant:
Doc King, William Freeman, Richard Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00282
Plaintiff:
Kevin Smith
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Joe Paige, III, Thomas Hearst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
Damien Ford
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Marshall Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Clark County Detention Center Facility et al
as 6:2021cv06164
Plaintiff:
John Michael Nichols
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center Facility, Hot Spring County Drug Task Force and Clark County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radford v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00905
Plaintiff:
Jessie Terrell Radford
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Clark, Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Clark et al
as 4:2021cv00674
Plaintiff:
Wallace T Robinson, Sr
Defendant:
Adam Clark, Emmer Branch, Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Varner Super Max
as 4:2021cv00758
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J Russell
Defendant:
Varner Super Max, Pierce, Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
