Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 71 - 80 of 107
Chevallier v. Pollock et al
as 5:2013ct03315
Plaintiff: Agnes M. Chevallier
Defendant: Ms. Pollock, Mr. Baker and B. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. RANDOLPH CORRECTIONAL CENTER
as 1:2013cv00984
Plaintiff: MICHAEL S. BAKER
Defendant: RANDOLPH CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Thomas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv00135
Plaintiff: Robert E. Baker
Defendant: Richard Thomas, Richard Hamilton, Jamie Travis and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Reidinger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00226
Plaintiff: Floyd Lee Baker
Defendant: Martin K. Reidinger and Fredilyn Sison
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Whitener et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013de00096
Plaintiff: Robert E. Baker
Defendant: Keith Whitener, Richard Thomas, Richard Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Tripp
as 5:2013hc02030
Petitioner: Todd E. Baker
Respondent: Brick Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SWITZER v. BAKER-HARRELL et al
as 1:2012cv01272
Plaintiff: ROBBIE LEE SWITZER
Defendant: WOODRENA BAKER-HARRELL and HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivins action
Baker v. United States Parole Commission
as 5:2012hc02257
Petitioner: Salis D. Baker
Respondent: United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Knight v. Smith et al
as 3:2012de00666
Plaintiff: Wendell Knight
Defendant: Lewis Smith, Robert G. Jones, Felix C. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. USA
as 1:2012cv00949
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: VINCENTE ANTOINE BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?