Cases 71 - 80 of 2,170
Comley v. Lawson et al
as 2:2023cv00960
Plaintiff:
Derek Comley
Defendant:
Deputy Lawson, Judge Burns and Charlotte County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfred Johnson, Sr. v. Annette Chambers-Smith, et al
as 23-3891
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED A. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director, DEVIN HOOVER, Inspector, UNIT MANAGER WILLIS and others
Burns v. City of Yonkers et al
as 1:2023cv09787
Plaintiff:
George Burns
Defendant:
City of Yonkers, County of Westchester, Captain Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. Clinton
as 1:2023cv09621
Petitioner:
Trevor Burns
Respondent:
Joe Clinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timothy Whittle v. Camden County Sheriff's Dept. and Corrections Div., et al
as 23-3388
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Whittle
Defendant / Appellee:
Camden County Sheriff's Department, and Corrections Division, Anthony Helms, Camden County Sheriff, Bollard, Camden County Deputy Sheriff and others
Burns v. Long et al
as 1:2023cv09399
Plaintiff:
George Burns
Defendant:
Mary Pat Long, ADA Medina, Deena Dennley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forbes v. LaSalle County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv15298
Plaintiff:
James Forbes
Defendant:
LaSalle County Jail, Well Path, John Banda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ibbison v. Scagliarni et al
as 3:2023cv01379
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Ibbison
Defendant:
Scagliarni, Swol, Ericson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Birdyshaw et al
as 2:2023cv01395
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
John Birdyshaw, Mathew Burns, Chad Geschke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burns v. Smith
as 1:2023cv09088
Plaintiff:
George Burns
Defendant:
Russell B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
