Cases 71 - 80 of 196
Lester v. Booth et al
as 1:2019cv00093
Plaintiff:
Buford Ule Lester, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Mary Cook, Lt. Booth and Warden Streeter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Platt v. Dunn et al
as 1:2019cv00080
Defendant:
Lynn Head, State Of Alabama and Jefferson S. Dunn
Plaintiff:
Ernest F. Platt
Respondent:
Warden Mary Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McConico v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Parole et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00111
Plaintiff:
James McConico, Jr.
Defendant:
Eddie Cook, Alabama Board of Pardons & Parole, Lyn Head and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dixon v. Cooks
as 1:2019cv00026
Plaintiff:
Roger Dixon
Defendant:
Mary Cooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gilley v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00022
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles, Eddie Cook, Jr. and Cliff Walker
Plaintiff:
Dale William Gilley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Cooks (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv01045
Plaintiff:
Roger Dixon
Defendant:
Mary Cooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. Cook et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv01042
Defendant:
Captain King, Alabama Department of Corrections, Bullock Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Hunter Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malloy v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00974
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Lyn Head, Robert Longshore and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Brennan Malloy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blount v. Culliver et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00970
Defendant:
Vivian McQueen, Joseph Headley, Mary Cooks and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Alexander Blount
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dempsey v. Dunn (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00925
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dempsey
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Lt. Roseman, Sgt. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
