Cases 71 - 78 of 78
OTTAVIANO v. HENDRICKS et al
as 2:2010cv05028
Petitioner:
RONALD OTTAVIANO
Respondent:
ROY L. HENDRICKS, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BAKHTIAR v. HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2010cv04284
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BAKHTIAR
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COUNTY OF HUDSON GOVERNMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Essex County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2009cv12189
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Davis
Defendant:
Essex County Correctional Facility, Director of Classification, Commissoner of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SINGH v. BRANTLEY et al
as 2:2009cv02597
Petitioner:
MEJAR SINGH
Respondent:
BRANTLEY, SCOTT WEBBER, JAMES HAYES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vaccaro v. Essex County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2009cv10157
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Vaccaro
Defendant:
Essex County Sheriff's Department, Essex County Correctional Facility, Unknown Officer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety et al
as 1:2009cv10129
Plaintiff:
Albert S. Hobson
Defendant:
Commonwealth of massachusetts Exedutive Office of Public Safety, Kevin Burke, Essex County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
VAUGHN v. ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2008cv01759
Plaintiff:
LAMONT VAUGHN
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and BAPTISTE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CHARLES v. ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2007cv04309
Plaintiff:
KEYENN CHARLES
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. (CMS), SOUTHERN STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
