Cases 71 - 80 of 1,168
Joyner v. Department of Adult Correction et al
as 5:2023ct03135
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lee Joyner
Defendant:
Department of Adult Correction, Superintendent Reid, Asst. Superintendent Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Bullard et al
as 5:2023ct03119
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Edwards
Defendant:
J. Bullard, Mr. Jacobs, Franklin Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02071
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
James v. Cooper et al
as 1:2023cv00093
Defendant:
Ralph Gilbert, III, Douglas Gold, Roy Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance L. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Warden of Butner Medium I
as 5:2023hc02061
Petitioner:
Larry A. Lee, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden of Butner Medium I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilson v. USP Lee
as 5:2023hc02060
Petitioner:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Respondent:
USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Joyner v. Evans et al
as 5:2023ct03081
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lee Joyner
Defendant:
Dr. Charlotte A. Evans, Captain Turley, Sergeant Riddick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDREWS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
ALBERT LEE ANDREWS, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFF SESSIONS, RIPLEY RAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
THOMPSON v. USA
as 1:2023cv00241
Petitioner:
TONY LEE THOMPSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Wilson v. USP Lee
as 5:2023ct03068
Plaintiff:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Defendant:
USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
