Cases 71 - 80 of 81
Freemon v. Ryan et al
as 2:2009cv01717
Plaintiff:
Ace Bailey Freemon
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, J Freeland, Robert Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. Collett et al
as 2:2009cv01331
Plaintiff:
Russell W. Chavez
Defendant:
Seal Collett, Don Davis, Manuel Lerma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fasullo v. Fasullo et al
as 2:2008cv02322
Plaintiff:
Louis Fasullo
Defendant:
Carolina Fasullo, Lisa Pickett, Dena Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Foster v. Emmans et al
as 4:2008cv00624
Plaintiff:
Larry Foster
Defendant:
Lisa Emmans and Dora Schriro
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dehart v. Haley et al
as 2:2008cv01552
Plaintiff:
David Dehart
Defendant:
Herb Haley, John Palosaari, Kevin Curran and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brand v. Emmans et al
as 4:2008cv00461
Plaintiff:
Herbert Brand
Respondent:
Lisa Emmans and Director Dora Schriro
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Benally v. Pribil et al
as 3:2008cv08097
Plaintiff:
Dean Benally
Defendant:
Bill Pribil, Lisa Hirsch and Unknown
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Torrez v. Macy's Department Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv02262
Plaintiff:
Remigo G Torrez
Defendant:
Macy's Department Stores, Inc., Mall Security, Biltmore Shopping Mall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2007cv00571
Petitioner:
Lisa Ann Jackson
Respondent:
Arizona Department of Corrections and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Magnuson v. Arizona State Psychiatric Security Review Board et al
as 2:2007cv01976
Plaintiff:
Joel Shapel Magnuson
Defendant:
Arizona State Psychiatric Security Review Board, Arizona Department of Health Services, Carol Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
