Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 71 - 80 of 157
RICHARDSON v. PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv05490
Plaintiff: DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Defendant: PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. and KAREN MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv01456
Petitioner: KEVIN LEE MURPHY
Respondent: JOHN WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TILLMAN v. CLIFTON et al
as 2:2016cv04707
Plaintiff: JERJUAN DAYMAR TILLMAN
Defendant: WILLIAM CLIFTON, JOESPH MURPHY and AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREDICO v. BOKHARI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv03726
Plaintiff: JUSTIN CREDICO
Defendant: BOKHARI, BAKER and MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. USA
as 1:2016cv01277
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: James Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BROWN v. CHESTER COUNTY PRISON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv03097
Plaintiff: DONALD P. BROWN, SR.
Defendant: TERENCE FARRELL, D. EDWARD MCFADDEN, MORGAN TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. USA
as 1:2016cv01018
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Carl E. Murphy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MCKINLEY v. MCFADDEN, ET AL. et al
as 2:2016cv01605
Plaintiff: KEVIN VASHAUN MCKINLEY
Defendant: D. EDWARD MCFADDEN and KAREN MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. USA
as 2:2016cv00294
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: NICOLE MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ROBERTS v. CLARK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00107
Plaintiff: EARL ROBERTS
Defendant: Clark and Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?