Cases 71 - 80 of 104
SHEAFFER v. CAROUTHERS et al
as 4:2016cv00131
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROUTHERS, RONALD EVERSON, CHARLES MURPHY and others
Plaintiff:
BRYCE ALLEN SHEAFFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABNER v. CAROUTHERS et al
as 4:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE ABNER, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROUTHERS, ANNA MORRIS and CHARLES MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEREDITH v. CAROUTHERS et al
as 4:2016cv00088
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROUTHERS, ANNA MORRIS and CHARLES MURPHY
Plaintiff:
KEITH JOEL MEREDITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HESS v. CAROUTHERS et al
as 4:2016cv00089
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROUTHERS, ANNA MORRIS and CHARLES MURPHY
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. HESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DILLON v. CAROUTHERS et al
as 4:2016cv00090
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROUTHERS, ANNA MORRIS and CHARLES MURPHY
Plaintiff:
JONATHON DILLON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RUCKER v. CAROUTHERS et al
as 4:2016cv00087
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROUTHERS, ANNA MORRIS and CHARLES MURPHY
Plaintiff:
VINCENT LEONARD RUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MALOY v. CAROUTHERS et al
as 4:2016cv00091
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROUTHERS, ANNA MORRIS and CHARLES MURPHY
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MALOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HARRIS et al v. CAROUTHERS et al
as 4:2016cv00083
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROUTHERS, ANNA MORRIS and CHARLES MURPHY
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DILLON, DAVID MITCHELL HARRIS, JAMES D. HESS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANKH EL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2016cv00852
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH EL
Defendant:
SHEILA CARLISLE, TERRY CURRY, DANIEL HARRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRUND v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2016cv00096
Defendant:
CORIZON, DAVID HINCHMAN, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Plaintiff:
SUSAN GRUND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
