Cases 71 - 80 of 199
WILLIAMS v. MAY et al
as 2:2016cv02903
Plaintiff:
JAHMAL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MAY, ORTIZ, MARSHAL-TRANSFER JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROCKETT v. WINGARD
as 3:2016cv00104
Petitioner:
IVAN MARSHALL CROCKETT
Respondent:
TREVOR A. WINGARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HIDALGO NEIRA v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 3:2016cv00081
Plaintiff:
JORGE HUMBERTO HIDALGO NEIRA
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC., SEAN M. KUTA, NORENE GREENLEAF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DUARTE v. CURRENT DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
LUIS DUARTE
Defendant:
CURRENT DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ALL UNKNOWN BOP OFFICERS, ALL UNKNOWN FEDERAL AGENTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. HORNAK et al
as 2:2016mc00079
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
MARK HORNAK, ORLANDO HARPER, DAVID HICTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hymon v. DeRose et al
as 1:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
James L. Hymon
Defendant:
Dominick DeRose, Josh Marshall, Jess Weary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMOS v. UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICES et al
as 5:2015cv06360
Petitioner:
JOSEPH LUIS RAMOS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICES, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICES, SANDRA BECKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PRISONERS UNITED TOGETHER ETAL et al v. WOLF
as 2:2015cv05431
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, KATHLEEN KANE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
JOEZIEL VAZQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2015cv01256
Petitioner:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, JIM BRENNAN and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PICONE v. NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 2:2015cv01057
Plaintiff:
ADAM PICONE
Defendant:
NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER and U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
