Cases 71 - 80 of 156
Richard Johnson v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 13-10130
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD JAMES JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Johnson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2012cv00268
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Welk v. Cate
as 3:2012cv02943
Petitioner:
Richard James Welk
Respondent:
Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. TDCJ-CID's Safe Prisons Mandate et al
as 2:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID's Safe Prisons Mandate, PLRA's 3 Strike Provisons, Estate of John Ross Kay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Peshiek et al
as 3:2012cv01220
Plaintiff:
Richard James Anderson, Sr
Defendant:
Renee Peshiek, Val Quetti, Gary Smolek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2012cv00215
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. TDCJ-CID's Safe Prisons Mandate et al
as 9:2012cv00187
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID's Safe Prisons Mandate, PLRA's 3 Strike Provisons, Estate of John Ross Kay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Johnson v. Constitutional Question
as 12-51033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION
USA v. Richard Dompier
as 12-35805
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD JAMES DOMPIER
Richard Johnson v. PLRA's 3 Strikes Provision, et al
as 12-10950
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD J JOHNSON, also known as Richard James Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
PLRA'S 3 STRIKES PROVISION and UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
