Cases 71 - 79 of 79
Riches v. Cristobal et al
as 1:2008cv06166
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
San Cristobal, Rocky Patel, Dos Lunas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salomon v. United States of America
as 5:2008cv08004
Petitioner:
Oscar Xicotencah Salomon
Respondent:
United States of America, United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Salomon v. Moya, et al
as 08-2002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSCAR G. SALOMON
Defendant - Appellee:
STANLEY MOYA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Cain et al v. United States et al
as 1:2007cv00702
Plaintiff:
David R. Cain, Sr. and David R. Cain, Jr.
Defendant:
United States, Peter A. Lawrence, Timothy R. Twarog and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Anderson et al
as 4:2007cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Pamela Anderson, Tommy Lee, Robert J. Ritchie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Salomon v. Moya et al
as 1:2007cv00740
Plaintiff:
Oscar G Salomon
Defendant:
Stanley Moya and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salomon v. Moya et al
as 6:2007cv00740
Plaintiff:
Oscar G Salomon
Defendant:
Stanley Moya and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mendoza v. Ring et al
as 3:2007cv03144
Plaintiff:
Salomon Mendoza
Defendant:
S Ring, Tara Goins, Brenda Sheppard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaarbay v. The State of Florida et al
as 0:2007cv60558
Plaintiff:
Carlos Shaarbay
Defendant:
The State of Florida, The City of Hollywood Police Department, The City of Davie Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
