Cases 81 - 90 of 97
Coleman v. Allen et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2009cv00311
Plaintiff:
John Stephen Coleman
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Lewis Boyd, Kenneth Sconyers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coleman v. Giles et al (INMATE3)
as 1:2009cv00218
Plaintiff:
Michael Louis Coleman
Defendant:
J. C. Giles, Troy King and Stephen N. Dodd
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coleman v. Hetzel et al
as 2:2008cv02248
Petitioner:
Edward Dwight Coleman
Respondent:
Gary Hetzel and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Peterson v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 6:2008cv01998
Plaintiff:
Charlie O'Neal Peterson
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Malcolm Hendricks, Bradford Adams and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Duncan v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2008cv01629
Plaintiff:
Charles William Duncan
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Brackner, Linda Chew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory v. Robinson et al
as 2:2008cv01392
Plaintiff:
Omahr A Gregory
Defendant:
Robinson, Straittion, Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coleman v. Giles et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2008cv00436
Plaintiff:
Michael Louis Coleman
Defendant:
J. C. Giles and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coleman v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv00472
Plaintiff:
Elijah Coleman
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Kenneth L Jones, Donal Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Deville
as 1:2008cv00403
Petitioner:
Shaeffer Coleman
Respondent:
Deville and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coleman v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00109
Plaintiff:
Elijah Coleman
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Kenneth L. Jones, Donal Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
