Cases 81 - 90 of 103
Wilkerson v. Nies et al
as 2:2012cv02251
Plaintiff:
James R. Wilkerson
Defendant:
G. Nies, A. M. Rodriguez, D. Britton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan K Tatum v. T Ochoa et al
as 5:2012cv00405
Defendant:
Burt, George, Gonzalez and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan K Tatum
Perez-Rivera v. Correctional Health Services Corp. et al
as 3:2011cv02169
Plaintiff:
Severo Perez-Rivera
Defendant:
Correctional Health Services Corp., Administracion de Correccion y Reabilitacion, Jesus Gonzalez-Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner v. Gutierrez, Jr et al
as 2:2011cv00320
Plaintiff:
Willi Free I Garner
Defendant:
Ernest Gutierrez, Jr, Robert Crites, Norris D Jackson and others
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Downstate Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2011cv05904
Plaintiff:
Larry Dixon
Defendant:
Downstate Correctional Facility, Male Doctor from 6/11/11 Nurse Fred, Female Doctor from 6/11/11 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Jester IV Unit et al
as 4:2011cv01776
Plaintiff:
Pedro M. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Jester IV Unit and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Carlton Smith v. L. Stepp
as 2:2011cv02277
Defendant:
D. Battles, D. Battles, J. Cermeno and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Carlton Smith
Lawrence C Smith et al v. L Stepp et al
as 2:2010cv09850
Defendant:
D Battles, D Battles, J Cermeno and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence C Smith
Rodriguez-Nieves v. United States Of America
as 1:2010cv09264
Petitioner:
Jose M. Rodriguez-Nieves
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodriguez v. New York City Department of Correction et al
as 1:2010cv05838
Plaintiff:
Angel M. Rodriguez
Defendant:
New York City Department of Correction, Declet, McLaughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
