Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 81 - 90 of 6,434
Smith v. Alves
as 1:2024cv10124
Petitioner: Craig Smith
Respondent: Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Piard v. Murphy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv40005
Plaintiff: Joseph Piard
Defendant: Carolyn Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Divris et al
as 1:2024cv10089
Plaintiff: Timothy Barker
Defendant: Matthew Divris, Anthony Findley and Joe Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Superintendent MCI Shirley
as 1:2024cv10057
Petitioner: Maurice Morrison
Respondent: Superintendent MCI Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salsbury v. Gray
as 1:2024cv10052
Petitioner: Arthur E. Salsbury
Respondent: Dean Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salsbury v. Gray
as 1:2024cv10050
Petitioner: Arthur E. Salsbury and Arthur E. Salsbury, Jr.
Respondent: Dean Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Piard v. Stanley
as 4:2024cv40004
Plaintiff: Joseph Piard
Defendant: Kelly Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vitaly Borker v. Warden Bowers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv10045
Petitioner: Vitaly Borker
Respondent: Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Piard v. Hakala et al
as 4:2023cv40180
Plaintiff: Joseph Piard
Defendant: Officer Hakala and Officer Bariamis
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Schmitt v. Bowers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv13203
Petitioner: Thomas Schmitt
Respondent: United States of America and Warden J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?