Cases 81 - 90 of 345
Oakley v. Cathey et al
as 1:2019cv00047
Defendant:
Maury County Highway Dept. and Andy Cathey
Plaintiff:
Jaston Antione Oakley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Corizon Med. Provider et al
as 3:2019cv00400
Defendant:
Corizon Med. Provider, First Medical Management Med. provider, Robert Gery and others
Plaintiff:
Phillippe Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Tenn. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00281
Defendant:
Tenn. Dept. of Corrections and Connie S. Klein
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv02178
Plaintiff:
Shirley Walker
Defendant:
Tony Parker, FNU Gatewood, Johnny Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. Tennessee Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv01382
Plaintiff:
Delmar Mack
Defendant:
Latasha Taylor, Bledsoe Prison, Metro Government, Davidson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv01337
Plaintiff:
Shirley Walker
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Tennessee Department of Corrections, Internal Affairs Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Warren et al
as 3:2018cv01094
Defendant:
Alice Warren, Corizon Healthcare and Az. Dept. of Corr.
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Warren et al
as 3:2018cv01062
Defendant:
Alice Warren, Corizon Healthcare and Arizona Dept. of Corrs.
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanton et al v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2018cv00825
Defendant:
Core Civic and Tenn. Dept. of Corr.
Plaintiff:
Juan LaSean Perry and Jacob Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byner v. Tennessee Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
Auqeith Byner
Defendant:
Tennessee Dept. of Corrections, Captain Henson, Todd Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
