Cases 81 - 90 of 166
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00335
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES LICENSE AND THEFT DIVISION, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00287
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, K. D. MACKEY, C. C. BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GRAHAM et al
as 1:2016cv00283
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
P. J. GRAHAM and NORTH CAROLINA DEPTARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00284
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. TOMIN et al
as 1:2016cv00273
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. TOMIN, JR., R.M. ASHLEY, K.D. MORLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00245
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C.C. BLAKE, R.M ASHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vandyke v. US District Court Administration et al
as 1:2016cv00038
Plaintiff:
Dennis Roger Vandyke
Defendant:
US District Court Administration, Clerks of Court, Rutherford County Court, Lacy Thornburg and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN DYKE v. MULLEN et al
as 1:2016cv00118
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
GRAHAM C. MULLEN, CLERK OF COURT ASHEVILLE WESTERN DISTRICT USDC, CLERKS OF COURT RUTHERFORDTON NC DISTRICT AND SUPERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMPTON v. US GOVERNMENT/USA et al
as 1:2015cv00904
Plaintiff:
TRAE JAVAR COMPTON
Defendant:
US GOVERNMENT/USA, ERIC HOLDER, GRAHAM GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COMPTON v. US GOVERNMENT/USA et al
as 1:2015cv00798
Plaintiff:
TRAE JAVAR COMPTON
Defendant:
US GOVERNMENT/USA, GRAHAM GREEN, ATF, ETAL AGENTS UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
