Cases 81 - 90 of 998
Griffith v. Dannhauser et al
as 1:2022cv05865
Plaintiff:
Jelahn Julian Griffith
Defendant:
Jess Dannhauser, Frank Cresciullo, Albert A. Benjamin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Squire v. State of NY et al
as 2:2022cv05756
Plaintiff:
Kashon K Squire
Defendant:
State of NY, dule latifc, pall green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Falls v. Annucci et al
as 1:2022cv08055
Petitioner:
Raiquan K. Falls
Respondent:
Acting Commissioner Anthony J. Annucci, Carl E. DuBois and Jude T. Martini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilkerson v. Annucci et al
as 7:2022cv07804
Defendant:
Jeffrey Coulurl, Anthony J. Annucci, Royce and others
Plaintiff:
Mali Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfaro v. Baxter et al
as 6:2022cv06374
Plaintiff:
Alberto Alfaro
Defendant:
Todd K. Baxter, Maurice Leone, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Felder v. Annucci et al
as 6:2022cv06363
Plaintiff:
David Felder
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, K. Snyder, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staine v. Hochul et al
as 9:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Eric Staine
Defendant:
Kathy Hochul, Letitia James, Anthony Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sommers v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv00627
Plaintiff:
Neal D. Sommers
Defendant:
Dr. Williams, K. Milligan, E. Drankhan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bostic v. Rodriguez
as 6:2022cv06346
Plaintiff:
James B. Bostic
Defendant:
C.O. A. Rodriguez, C.O. Rivera, K. Morsha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Gille et al
as 1:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Raymond Boyd
Defendant:
P. Gille, K. Arnold, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
