Cases 81 - 90 of 930
Kincaid v. Fulton et al
as 3:2022cv50252
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Kincaid
Defendant:
D. Fulton, C. Cook, Lt. John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Raul Alcala v. Raymond Madden
as 5:2022cv01240
Petitioner:
Raul Alcala
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adam Limbrick v. Raymond Madden
as 22-55666
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADAM LIMBRICK
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
Vlasich v. Madden
as 3:2022cv00991
Petitioner:
Steven Vlasich
Respondent:
Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARROLL v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2022cv02690
Plaintiff:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Defendant:
LAURA WILLIAMS, KEVIN MADDEN, WARDEN GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Madden
as 3:2022cv00951
Petitioner:
Kelly Beau Davis
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blackgold v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv00915
Plaintiff:
Suten Blackgold
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, Mario Alonzo, D. Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Clayborne et al v. TRITI et al
as 2:2022cv00694
Plaintiff:
Jack A Clayborne, Robert D Cartledge, Justin L Williams and others
Defendant:
TRITI, MPJMJ, CNMCM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latham v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2022cv00842
Plaintiff:
Joshua Latham
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Connie Gipson, Raymond Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Removal- Civil Rights Act
Serna v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv00841
Plaintiff:
Alfred David Serna
Defendant:
Madden, Escobar, C. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
