Cases 81 - 90 of 91
Cifuentes v. Calderon et al
as 6:2008cv01817
Plaintiff:
Diomedes Cifuentes, Jr.
Defendant:
Carlos Calderon, James Meyn, Will McCurdy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McCurdy v. USA
as 2:2008cv00526
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mark McCurdy
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
THE COMMONWEALTH v. MCCURDY et al
as 2:2007cv04367
Petitioner:
THE COMMONWEALTH
Respondent:
BOBBY MCCURDY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCurdy v. Curry et al
as 4:2007cv05084
Petitioner:
Kenneth Donald McCurdy
Respondent:
Ben Curry and Jim Tilman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glen Franklin McCurdy v. Antelope Valley et al
as 2:2007cv05425
Plaintiff:
Glen Franklin McCurdy
Defendant:
Antelope Valley and Los Angeles County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
McCurdy v. The People of California et al
as 5:2007cv04072
Petitioner:
Rex A. McCurdy
Respondent:
The People of the State of California, Napa County and Thomas Voss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kenneth Donald McCurdy v. Ben Curry et al
as 2:2007cv04732
Petitioner:
Kenneth Donald McCurdy
Respondent:
Ben Curry and Jim Tilman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCurdy v. Mayberg et al
as 5:2007cv03657
Petitioner:
Rex McCurdy
Respondent:
Stephen W. Mayberg and Tom Voss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WATTS v. SMITH et al
as 5:2007cv00128
Plaintiff:
ROBIN DEMETRECE WATTS
Defendant:
MARK SMITH, DEBBIE ANDERSON, NEIL DELMAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCurdy v. Mayberg et al
as 2:2007cv01059
Petitioner:
Rex A. McCurdy
Respondent:
Stephen W Mayberg and Tom Voss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
