Cases 81 - 90 of 97
Lakesha Norington v. Mitchell Daniels, Jr., et al
as 11-3845
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAKESHA NORINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCHELL E. DANIELS, JR., Governor, EDWIN G. BUSS, Commissioner, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, and its representatives and others
Wahl v. Marandet et al
as 3:2011cv00419
Plaintiff:
Cory Wahl
Defendant:
Dr Noe Marandet , Corizon Healthcare and Dr Michael Mitcheff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dan Richards v. Michael Mitcheff, et al
as 11-3227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY R. RICHARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF, M.D., RICHARD HIRSCHLER, M.D., TARIS GONZALEZ and others
HARGETT v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01316
Defendant:
DAVID CLARK, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., MICHELLE L. HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES B. HARGETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eddie Vaughans v. Michael Mitcheff
as 11-3116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE VAUGHANS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF
Wright v. Buss et al
as 3:2010cv00451
Plaintiff:
Ken-ya Wright
Defendant:
Ed Buss , Mark Levenhagen , Dr Michael Mitcheff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Bowman v. Edwin Buss, et al
as 09-4139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. BOWMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWIN G. BUSS, BRETT MIZE, MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor and others
Vaughans v. Nelson et al
as 3:2009cv00370
Plaintiff:
Eddie Vaughans
Defendant:
Dawn Nelson, Mark Levenhagan, Rose Vausvukas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turcsik v. Mitcheff et al
as 3:2009cv00306
Plaintiff:
Stephen J Turcsik
Defendant:
Dr Michael Mitcheff, Barbara Brubaker, Dr John Israel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 3:2009cv00298
Plaintiff:
Charles E Watkins
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Noe Marandet, Michael Mitcheff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
