Cases 81 - 90 of 887
Jason Latrell Thomas v. G. Marhsall et al
as 2:2022cv05446
Plaintiff:
Jason Latrell Thomas
Defendant:
G. Marshall, J. Villa, G. Ortega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Moody v. Gonzalez et al
as 2:2022cv01342
Plaintiff:
Kayshon Lamont Moody
Defendant:
D. Gonzalez, C. Tuyen, R. Valine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04316
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PC) Figueroa v. Clark. et al.
as 1:2022cv00916
Plaintiff:
Ruben Figueroa
Defendant:
Ken Clark, Paul Silva, Susan Doherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Figueroa v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
Ruben Figueroa
Defendant:
Ken Clark, Paul Silva, Susan Doherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Daly City Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv04187
Plaintiff:
David Khan
Defendant:
Daly City Police Department, Jose Ortega, Jr., Joshua Moala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortega v. Brown et al
as 3:2022cv04185
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ortega
Defendant:
Z. Brown, H. Orozco and L. Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Figueroa v. Clark et al
as 3:2022cv01030
Plaintiff:
Ruben Figueroa
Defendant:
Ken Clark, Paul Silva, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Daly City Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv04064
Plaintiff:
David Khan
Defendant:
Daly City Police Department, Jose Ortega, Charles Baroni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortega v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv08021
Petitioner:
Nolberto Ortega
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
