Cases 81 - 90 of 117
IWANICKI v. CHESTER COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2013cv00632
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER IWANICKI
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY GOVERNMENT , CHESTER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS , THOMAS L. WHITMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv00257
Plaintiff:
Jose F. Sanchez
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CREDICO v. SANCHEZ et al
as 2:2012cv07055
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN CREDICO
Defendant:
SANCHEZ, LAMB MCERLANE PC and CHESTER COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. USP Canaan
as 3:2012cv02436
Plaintiff:
Ruben Sanchez
Defendant:
USP Canaan
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SANCHEZ v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2012cv06546
Petitioner:
ABRAHAM SANCHEZ, JR.
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
SANCHEZ v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2012cv06510
Petitioner:
VIRGILIO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PENA-SANCHEZ v. MEEKS
as 1:2012cv00195
Petitioner:
MANUEL PENA-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
BOBBY L. MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PUGO-SANCHEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2012cv00161
Petitioner:
RODOLFO PUGO-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sanchez et al v. Klepacz et al
as 3:2012cv01076
Plaintiff:
Rodney Cossari, Victor Sanchez, Taylor Lyons and others
Defendant:
Klepacz, Shirley Moore Smeal, Cooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett et al v. Holt et al
as 1:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Reginald Barnett, Austin Grupee, Ronald Yarborough and others
Defendant:
Ronnie Holt, W. Dobushak, Angela Dunbar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
