Cases 81 - 90 of 1,737
KING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00568
Petitioner:
LAMANUEL LAMAR KING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Meyers v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holland v. United States of America
as 5:2023hc02121
Petitioner:
Gregory T. Holland and Gregory Thomas Holland
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02117
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02111
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Mason v. United States of America
as 5:2023hc02101
Petitioner:
Frederick Mason
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MURPHY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00377
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LAVERNE MURPHY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MOORE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00383
Petitioner:
JERRELL MOORE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02092
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4248 Civil Commitment of a Sexually Dangerous Person
Knope v. United States of America
as 5:2023hc02087
Petitioner:
Terry Knope
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
