Cases 81 - 90 of 102
Morris v. United States of America et al
as 3:2012cv00073
Plaintiff:
Lonnie D. Morris
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prison Medical Department, E. Borham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Bowling v. Smith et al
as 5:2012cv00070
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Bowling, Jr.
Defendant:
Donald Smith, Mark Webster, Nathan Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pullen v. Lemaster et al
as 2:2012cv00015
Plaintiff:
Charles Pullen
Defendant:
D. Lemaster, M. Wilson, N. Shultz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lee v. United States of America et al
as 5:2012cv00001
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee
Defendant:
United States of America, USP Atwater, J. Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00073
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Lewis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2011cv00054
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Lewis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Terry O'Brien, Unknown John Doe Associate Wardens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. Thompson et al
as 2:2010cv00066
Plaintiff:
Larry Arnold Young
Defendant:
D. Thompson, Duranko, D. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allen v. Cross et al
as 1:2010cv00011
Plaintiff:
Bernard Allen
Defendant:
Cross, Cheatam, Inmate Systems Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Robinson v. Janiszewski et al
as 5:2009cv00064
Plaintiff:
Patrick Robinson
Defendant:
Cecelia Janiszewski, James Spencer, Unknown Defendant - Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Simpson v. Charleston Police Department et al
as 2:2009cv00021
Plaintiff:
Cory Anthony Simpson
Defendant:
Charleston Police Department and Unknown Charleston Police Officers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
