Cases 81 - 90 of 170
Madeline Rodgers v. USA
as 18-11108
Petitioner - Appellant:
MADELINE RODGERS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
:
MONEY STORE, CITIMORTGAGE, INC., CITICORP CREDIT SERVICES, INC. and others
Leonard v. Island County et al
as 2:2018cv00322
Plaintiff:
Curtis Scot Leonard
Defendant:
Island County, Alan Hancock, Vickie Churchill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sundari Prasad v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 17-7224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUNDARI K. PRASAD
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, CAROLYN D. NELSON, VIVIENE B. CHEEK and others
Jones v. Tulalip Tribes Finance & Member & Employees et al
as 2:2017cv01155
Plaintiff:
Melvin L. Jones
Defendant:
Tulalip Tribes Finance & Member & Employees, JK Tsoodle, Sharon Jones Hayden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yaigel Pestana v. USA
as 17-13118
Petitioner - Appellant:
YAIGEL HERNANDEZ PESTANA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
:
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO, JPMORGAN CHASE & COMPANY and others
Shamont Sapp v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 17-16332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAMONT LYLE SAPP
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Omar Estrada v. USA
as 17-12743
Petitioner - Appellant:
OMAR A. ESTRADA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
:
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
ROSEBAR et al v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2017cv00978
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROSEBAR and ERIN ROSEBAR
Defendant:
DAVID BROOKS, WENDELL ROBINSON, WILLIAM C. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prasad v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 3:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Sundari Karma Prasad
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, Carolyn D. Nelson, Viviene B. Cheek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. WELLS FARGO BANK & CO. et al
as 1:2016cv02451
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LEON BRYANT
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK & COMPANY, JOHN STUMPF, STEPHEN SANGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
