Cases 1 - 10 of 132
MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
MARK L. MARTIN, II
Defendant:
CLARENCE BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
MARK L. MARTIN, II
Defendant:
CHARLES BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURRITT v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BURRITT
Defendant:
EMERSON, AMY ROLLINGS and DAWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWANN v. IND DEPT. OF CORR et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SWANN
Defendant:
IND DEPT. OF CORR, CHRISTINA REAGLE, JAMES BASINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haddox v. Richison
as 1:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
James Parrish Haddox
Defendant:
Amy Richison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, LITTLEJOHN, KEVIN ELMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunn v. St Joseph Cnty et al
as 3:2023cv00874
Plaintiff:
Jason R Nunn
Defendant:
St Joseph Cnty, Elizabeth C Hurley and Amy Cressy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haddox v. Newton et al
as 1:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
James Parrish Haddox
Defendant:
Chris Newton, Debbie Meier, Paul Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, LAUREN CUPP, CHANTELL KNEEP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH BEDWELL, DENTIST, BOBBI RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
