Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Seadorf v. Damante et al
as 2:2024cv02035
Plaintiff:
Arthur William Seadorf, Sr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Jim Damante, Officer Jonathan Stroud and Booking Officer Reed Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newman v. Payne et al
as 2:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Clifford Arthur Newman
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Solomon Graves and Tommy Hurst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Poindexter v. Brown et al
as 4:2022cv00676
Plaintiff:
Eddie Arthur Poindexter, Jr
Defendant:
J D Brown, Kalah D Smith, T A Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moler v. Wells et al
as 4:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Defendant:
Wells, Ian Connors and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tisdale v. Griffith et al
as 2:2020cv02066
Defendant:
Aundrea Griffith, Joseph Cooper, Marguerite Stout and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Michael Tisdale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Oliver et al
as 1:2020cv01013
Defendant:
Lieutenant Colten Oliver, Sergeant Sawyer Stanton, Deputy Cody Broswell and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Arthur Allen, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moler v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2019cv00097
Defendant:
Rosemary Stiles, Wooten, Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. USA
as 4:2019cv00088
Petitioner:
Arthur Anderson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Coley v. Kelley et al
as 4:2018cv00296
Plaintiff:
Keith E Coley
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, John Felts, Arthur Osaghae-Nosayi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coley v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 5:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
Keith E Coley
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Arkansas Department of Community Correction, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
